relevance-summary.md

name	description	true	engine	permissions	tools	safe-outputs
Relevance Summary	Manually triggered workflow that summarizes all open issues and PRs with a /relevance-check response into a single issue	workflow_dispatch	id copilot	contents issues pull-requests read read read	github toolsets default	create-issue title-prefix labels close-older-issues [Relevance Summary] report true

Relevance Check Summary Report

You are a report generator for the ${{ github.repository }} repository. Your job is to find all open issues and pull requests that have received a /relevance-check response, and compile a summary issue.

Instructions

1. Find Relevant Items

Search all open issues and pull requests in this repository. For each one, read its comments and look for a comment that contains a "Relevance Assessment" section — this is the output of the /relevance-check slash command.

A relevance-check response contains these markers:

• A heading or bold text with "Relevance Assessment:" followed by one of: Still Relevant, Likely Outdated, or Needs Discussion
• A Recommendation section with one of: ✅ Keep open, 🗄️ Consider closing, or 💬 Needs maintainer input

2. Extract Information

For each issue or PR that has a relevance-check response, extract:

• The issue/PR number and title
• Whether it is an issue or a pull request
• The relevance assessment verdict (Still Relevant / Likely Outdated / Needs Discussion)
• The recommended action (Keep open / Consider closing / Needs maintainer input)

3. Create the Summary Issue

Create a single issue with a table summarizing all findings. Use this structure:

### Relevance Check Summary

Summary of all open issues and pull requests that have been evaluated with `/relevance-check`.

**Generated:** YYYY-MM-DD

| # | Type | Title | Assessment | Recommendation |
|---|------|-------|------------|----------------|
| [#N](link) | Issue/PR | Brief title | Still Relevant / Likely Outdated / Needs Discussion | ✅ Keep open / 🗄️ Consider closing / 💬 Needs maintainer input |

### Statistics
- Total evaluated: N
- Still Relevant: N
- Likely Outdated: N
- Needs Discussion: N

4. Guidelines

• If no open issues or PRs have a relevance-check response, create the issue stating that no items were found.
• Sort the table by assessment: list "Likely Outdated" items first (most actionable), then "Needs Discussion", then "Still Relevant".
• Keep titles brief in the table — truncate to ~60 characters if needed.
• Always link the issue/PR number to its URL.