Skip to content

feat(create-cli): add CI/CD setup step#1266

Open
hanna-skryl wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
ci-setup-step
Open

feat(create-cli): add CI/CD setup step#1266
hanna-skryl wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
ci-setup-step

Conversation

@hanna-skryl
Copy link
Collaborator

@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl commented Mar 10, 2026

Closes #1246

A CI/CD integration prompt is added to the create-cli setup wizard. Users can select GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD (or skip) to generate the appropriate workflow configuration.

GitHub Actions outputs a .github/workflows/code-pushup.yml with monorepo support when applicable. GitLab CI/CD creates .gitlab-ci.yml or a separate file to include in it if one already exists. The CI provider can also be set via --ci CLI argument, and defaults to skip with --yes.

@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl self-assigned this Mar 10, 2026
@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Mar 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit ee84cbb

Command Status Duration Result
nx run ci:code-pushup -- merge-diffs --files=/h... ✅ Succeeded 6s View ↗
nx run-many --targets=code-pushup --parallel=fa... ✅ Succeeded 1m 34s View ↗
nx run-many --targets=code-pushup --parallel=fa... ✅ Succeeded 14m 12s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2026-03-10 17:52:44 UTC

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Open in StackBlitz

@code-pushup/ci

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/ci@1266

@code-pushup/cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/cli@1266

@code-pushup/core

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/core@1266

@code-pushup/create-cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/create-cli@1266

@code-pushup/models

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/models@1266

@code-pushup/nx-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/nx-plugin@1266

@code-pushup/axe-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/axe-plugin@1266

@code-pushup/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/eslint-plugin@1266

@code-pushup/coverage-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/coverage-plugin@1266

@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin@1266

@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin@1266

@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin@1266

@code-pushup/typescript-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/typescript-plugin@1266

@code-pushup/utils

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/utils@1266

commit: ee84cbb

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Code PushUp

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions – compared current commit a92f51e with previous commit 9468272.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Categories

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Performance 🔴 28 🔴 33 ↑ +5.3
Best Practices 🟢 97 🟢 100 ↑ +3.4
Documentation 🟡 52 🟡 52 ↓ −0.1
Code coverage 🟢 92 🟢 92 ↓ −0.1
Bug prevention 🟡 75 🟡 75 ↓ −0.1
Axe Accessibility 🟡 88 🟡 88 ↓ −0.1
Code style 🟢 100 🟢 100 –
Security 🔴 0 🔴 0 –
Updates 🟡 73 🟡 73 –
Type Safety 🟡 67 🟡 67 –
Miscellaneous 🟡 67 🟡 67 –
Accessibility 🟢 92 🟢 92 –
SEO 🟢 92 🟢 92 –
👍 2 groups improved, 👎 2 groups regressed, 👍 7 audits improved, 👎 6 audits regressed, 11 audits changed without impacting score

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Lighthouse Performance 🔴 28 🔴 33 ↑ +5.3
Lighthouse Best Practices 🟢 97 🟢 100 ↑ +3.4
JSDocs coverage Documentation coverage 🟡 52 🟡 52 ↓ −0.1
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟢 92 🟢 92 ↓ −0.1

30 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
Lighthouse Initial server response time was short 🟩 Root document took 520 ms 🟥 Root document took 610 ms ↑ +16.8 %
Lighthouse No browser errors logged to the console 🟥 failed 🟩 passed ↑ +∞ %
Lighthouse Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 🟥 Potential savings of 97 KiB 🟨 Potential savings of 98 KiB ↓ −100 %
Lighthouse Speed Index 🟥 10.3 s 🟥 6.8 s ↓ −34.4 %
Lighthouse First Contentful Paint 🟥 4.1 s 🟥 3.2 s ↓ −22.5 %
Lighthouse Time to Interactive 🟥 26.2 s 🟥 14.3 s ↓ −45.5 %
Lighthouse Total Blocking Time 🟥 9,250 ms 🟥 3,950 ms ↓ −57.3 %
Code coverage Line coverage 🟩 92.8 % 🟩 92.6 % ↓ −0.2 %
JSDocs coverage Functions coverage 🟥 618 undocumented functions 🟥 626 undocumented functions ↑ +1.3 %
JSDocs coverage Variables coverage 🟥 282 undocumented variables 🟥 286 undocumented variables ↑ +1.4 %
JSDocs coverage Types coverage 🟥 277 undocumented types 🟥 278 undocumented types ↑ +0.4 %
Code coverage Function coverage 🟩 94.1 % 🟩 94.1 % ↑ +0.1 %
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟨 89.2 % 🟨 89.2 % ↓ −0.1 %
Lighthouse Server Backend Latencies 🟩 16,520 ms 🟩 230 ms ↓ −98.6 %
Lighthouse Metrics 🟩 100% 🟩 100% ↓ −45.5 %
Lighthouse Minimizes main-thread work 🟥 21.6 s 🟥 12.6 s ↓ −41.8 %
Lighthouse Avoids enormous network payloads 🟩 Total size was 2,386 KiB 🟩 Total size was 2,379 KiB ↓ −0.3 %
Lighthouse JavaScript execution time 🟥 9.3 s 🟥 5.3 s ↓ −43.2 %
Lighthouse Max Potential First Input Delay 🟥 2,550 ms 🟥 1,250 ms ↓ −51.1 %
Lighthouse Largest Contentful Paint 🟥 13.8 s 🟥 12.6 s ↓ −8.5 %
Lighthouse Reduce unused JavaScript 🟥 Potential savings of 343 KiB 🟥 Potential savings of 342 KiB ↑ +58.3 %
Lighthouse Network Round Trip Times 🟩 580 ms 🟩 10 ms ↓ −97.7 %
Lighthouse Uses efficient cache policy on static assets 🟨 31 resources found 🟨 31 resources found ↓ −0.1 %
Lighthouse Reduce unused CSS 🟥 Potential savings of 111 KiB 🟥 Potential savings of 111 KiB ↓ −30.9 %

654 other audits are unchanged.

@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2026 17:35
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Code PushUp

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions – compared current commit a92f51e with previous commit 9468272.

💼 Project create-cli

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage 🟢 91 🟢 91 ↑ +0.8
Documentation 🔴 24 🔴 24 ↓ −0.5

4 other categories are unchanged.

👍 1 group improved, 👎 1 group regressed, 👍 2 audits improved, 👎 3 audits regressed, 1 audit changed without impacting score

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟢 91 🟢 91 ↑ +0.8
JSDocs coverage Documentation coverage 🔴 24 🔴 24 ↓ −0.5

13 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
JSDocs coverage Functions coverage 🟥 39 undocumented functions 🟥 47 undocumented functions ↑ +20.5 %
JSDocs coverage Types coverage 🟥 13 undocumented types 🟥 14 undocumented types ↑ +7.7 %
Code coverage Function coverage 🟨 89.5 % 🟩 90.8 % ↑ +1.4 %
Code coverage Line coverage 🟩 93.8 % 🟩 94.6 % ↑ +0.8 %
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟩 92.2 % 🟩 91.9 % ↓ −0.3 %
JSDocs coverage Variables coverage 🟥 13 undocumented variables 🟥 17 undocumented variables ↑ +30.8 %

437 other audits are unchanged.

💼 Project plugin-jsdocs

🥳 Code PushUp report has improved.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage 🟢 97 🟢 98 ↑ +0.7

5 other categories are unchanged.

👍 1 group improved, 👍 2 audits improved

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟢 97 🟢 98 ↑ +0.7

14 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
Code coverage Line coverage 🟩 96 % 🟩 100 % ↑ +4.2 %
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟩 92.5 % 🟩 93.6 % ↑ +1.2 %

442 other audits are unchanged.

💼 Project plugin-coverage

🥳 Code PushUp report has improved.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage 🟢 92 🟢 92 ↑ +0.4

5 other categories are unchanged.

👍 1 group improved, 👍 2 audits improved

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟢 92 🟢 92 ↑ +0.4

14 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
Code coverage Line coverage 🟨 89.1 % 🟩 92.6 % ↑ +4 %
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟨 89.6 % 🟨 89.8 % ↑ +0.2 %

442 other audits are unchanged.

💼 Project utils

😟 Code PushUp report has regressed.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage 🟢 95 🟢 95 ↓ −0.1

5 other categories are unchanged.

👎 1 group regressed, 👎 1 audit regressed

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟢 95 🟢 95 ↓ −0.1

14 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟩 91.4 % 🟩 91.4 % ↓ −0.1 %

443 other audits are unchanged.

10 other projects are unchanged.

@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl requested a review from matejchalk March 10, 2026 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@matejchalk matejchalk Awaiting requested review from matejchalk

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl

Labels

🧩 create-cli 🔬 testing writing tests

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create CI/CD job in setup wizard

1 participant

@hanna-skryl