Skip to content

JDBetteridge/unique ci docker tag#2868

Draft
JDBetteridge wants to merge 10 commits intomainfrom
JDBetteridge/unique_ci_docker_tag
Draft

JDBetteridge/unique ci docker tag#2868
JDBetteridge wants to merge 10 commits intomainfrom
JDBetteridge/unique_ci_docker_tag

Conversation

@JDBetteridge
Copy link
Contributor

DONT MERGE THIS UNTIL YOU HAVE ASKED IF IT'S READY ON SLACK!!!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.41%. Comparing base (7aae8d9) to head (1ac1672).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2868      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.04%   83.41%   +4.36%     
==========================================
  Files         248      248              
  Lines       51208    51208              
  Branches     4425     4425              
==========================================
+ Hits        40479    42716    +2237     
+ Misses       9921     7731    -2190     
+ Partials      808      761      -47     
Flag Coverage Δ
pytest-gpu-aomp-amdgpuX 68.74% <ø> (?)
pytest-gpu-gcc- 77.90% <ø> (?)
pytest-gpu-icx- 77.51% <ø> (?)
pytest-gpu-nvc-nvidiaX 69.25% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@JDBetteridge JDBetteridge force-pushed the JDBetteridge/unique_ci_docker_tag branch 2 times, most recently from 6221ef0 to a355301 Compare March 9, 2026 20:36
@JDBetteridge JDBetteridge force-pushed the JDBetteridge/unique_ci_docker_tag branch from 684f60a to bc4e789 Compare March 13, 2026 19:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant